Why the banks will destroy bitcoin


I work in the financial services industry. I have for the past year, and if it’s taught me one thing it’s this: government regulation in the space is overwhelming. Regulation is so onerous, it’s catapulting growth in an industry called compliance.

When you start a small business, you’re probably not thinking that you’re going to spend a huge chunk of your time figuring out laws, putting in place procedures to help comply with those laws, attending seminars to ensure you’re up to date on those laws, and auditing / querying your partners to ensure they comply with the laws, too. But that’s the cost of doing business in the financial services space. That’s why banks and financial services companies have full-time compliance directors with full-time minions who are tasked with ensuring their company follows the letter of the law.

Even Cryptsy knows that. Of the three jobs they have posted right now, two of them are for compliance roles. Compliance is king in finance. There’s a raft of rules, after all, that financial services companies have to meet. The average bank needs to comply with all these acts or organizations:

  • Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
  • Right to Financial Privacy Act
  • Bank Secrecy Act
  • Truth in Savings Act
  • Truth in Lending Act
  • Electronic Fund Transfer Act
  • Expedited Funds Availability Act
  • Regulation D (FRB)
  • Equal Credit Opportunity Act
  • Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
  • Fair Credit Reporting Act
  • Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices
  • Office of Foreign Assets Control
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
  • Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

While most of the regulations are centered around protecting consumers, a large part of them are also targeted at cutting funding off from terrorist organizations and preventing money laundering. As we know, part of bitcoin’s beauty is its anonymity. That’s also its Achilles heel. The pseudonymous currency makes tracking transactions nearly impossible. That stands in direct conflict with the government’s aim of keeping cash out of the hands of rogues and tax cheats.

So, we’re at something of an impasse. While Ben Bernanke has spoken positively about bitcoin, FinCen isn’t going to be happy permitting anonymous financial transactions. As I see it, there are only two possible solutions:

  1. The government requires individuals to register bitcoin wallets (or, at the very least, wallets with large balances).
  2. The government requires financial companies to report currency exchanges above a certain dollar amount (perhaps $10,000) when they involve the USD and bitcoin.

The second option sounds reasonable enough, and it may be the only thing preventing banks and onerous government regulation from destroying bitcoin in the U.S. How else can we reconcile an anonymous currency with the government’s aim of cutting off funding for terrorists, money launderers and tax evaders? I’d love to hear your solutions in the comment section below.

Relevant news